Identifiers & profiles
- ORCID 0009-0009-7697-2811
- Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20043846 (preprint v0.1)
- X (Twitter) @spectrumofall
- Bluesky spectrumofall.bsky.social
- Email marald@spectrumofeverything.com
Google Scholar · ResearchGate · arXiv — pending registration.
The Origin
The first intuition arrived at sixteen. Not with a formula or a book — with a feeling. A theory that was binary: everything is on or off, 1 or 0, but reality itself is not linear. Time does not run at the same pace for everyone.
In 2001, the writing began. Not because the answer was in hand — because the questions would not let go.
More than twenty-five years later, those questions have grown into a framework: Coherence — a unified theory connecting frequency, modulation, and perception across all scales of reality, from the Planck length to the observable universe.
- Age 16First intuitionThree principles, decades before words
- 2001Writing beginsNotes, sketches, early framework
- 2015LIGOGravitational waves at 35–150 Hz
- 2022CISS effectChirality confirmed as physical filter
- 2026CoherenceManuscript v0.1 · 5 predictions submitted
Methodology
The method is coherence-finding: locating patterns and connections that link separate domains — quantum physics, neuroscience, biology, cosmology — and asking what a single organizing principle would look like.
This is not established physics. It is a personal framework — built by an observer who is not a credentialed physicist, but who has studied the literature, followed the evidence, and been willing to have predictions falsified.
Five predictions (#32–36) were benchmarked against primary peer-reviewed papers in 2026. Two were falsified. One was found to be a category error. Two remain open. The theory was refined accordingly.
That is the process. That is the invitation.
Honest Limits
○ The mathematical formalism is incomplete. Some ideas have not been derived from first principles.
○ Some predictions may turn out to be untestable at present instrumentation limits.
○ Professional physicists may find errors that have not yet been identified.
○ Patterns that look analogous are not necessarily the same thing. The theory works on analogy — that can mislead.
What This Invites
If you are a physicist
Tell me where I am wrong. Point me to existing research that supports or contradicts these ideas. Help develop the mathematical framework.
If you are a biologist
The biophoton, DNA carrier wave, and coherence-radius predictions are directly testable. Collaboration on experimental design is welcome.
If you are curious
Start with Chapter 1. Read the epilogue. Then tell me what resonates — and what does not.
If you are a skeptic
Good. Read the peer-review section first. The falsifications are there on purpose — they are part of the argument, not a weakness of it.